Geopolitics, USA vs World
Greenland and the Panama Canal aren't for sale. Why is Trump threatening to take them? BBC (((Kayla Epstein)))
> https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1lnzzd1zrmo
> https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=Kayla+Epstein+BBC&ia=web
> https://yandex.com/search/?text=not+by+threats+shall+ye+prosper%2C+but+by+making+offers+they+shan%27t+refuse&lr=103426
> what? "superpower's muscle" maybe this is Epstein's mistaken interpretation from the supremacist attitude of Heebs... maybe she should try superpower's brains?
> what about taking back an authentic treaty? Our sacred Constitution, thruout its history, has shown us a future governing power has just as much moral authority to rescind decisions as previous authorities had to make them. Thus social systems (aka 'culture') evolve.
> https://yandex.com/search/?text=a+future+governing+power+has+just+as+much+moral+authority+to+rescind+decisions+as+previous+authorities+had+to+make+them&lr=103426&search_source=yacom_desktop_common
> "Panama Canal "falling into the wrong hands" and specifically cited China" This is simply a reiteration of Monroe Doctrine
> https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=Monroe+Doctrine&ia=web
China is a cultural economic competitor and military threat; US strategic interests over transcontinental passage is a legitimate concern, especially regards warships and support vessels. (note remarks by Wm. Freeman
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Wm+Freeman%2C+Latin+America%2C+CFR&t=lm&ia=web )
> "whether canal authorities lower fees on US cargo in response to the threat"; wait for threats to become actions... US Navy can blockade both ends of Canal; not passage, no revenues, age old tactic of siege warfare.
> both Greenland and Danish authorities are adamant the icy wilderness not for sale; but wait, Trump is expert at "The Art of the Deal"
> https://archive.org/details/TrumpTheArtOfTheDeal
so think of these vigorous denials as negotiating tactics, this is just the beginning; are you savvy in persuasion methods?
also, Team Trump includes Elan Musk, no retard in the world of big deals; so wait and see what combination of carrots and sticks (or 'sweet & sour sauce') our new deal meisters can scheme-up to make these foreign maneuvers happen; America First! (expect sweet deal offers to both Greenland and Denmark, after negotiations settle into a "green zone")
> Eric Trump, posted an image on X that showed the US adding Greenland, the Panama Canal and Canada to an Amazon online shopping cart
> https://x.com/EricTrump/status/1871376220115669456
> what is "America's Might" supposed to mean?
America might do this, it might do that, but only the POTUS knows for sure.
update Jan.13
EU Lost Donbass Lithium Mine Meant to Power Bloc’s ‘Green' Ambitions Jan 11.2025
https://sputnikglobe.com/20250111/eu-has-just-lost-donbass-lithium-mine-meant-to-power-blocs-green-ambitions-1121408616.html
Greenland and the Panama Canal aren't for sale. Why is Trump threatening to take them? BBC (((Kayla Epstein)))
> https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1lnzzd1zrmo
> https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=Kayla+Epstein+BBC&ia=web
> https://yandex.com/search/?text=not+by+threats+shall+ye+prosper%2C+but+by+making+offers+they+shan%27t+refuse&lr=103426
> what? "superpower's muscle" maybe this is Epstein's mistaken interpretation from the supremacist attitude of Heebs... maybe she should try superpower's brains?
> what about taking back an authentic treaty? Our sacred Constitution, thruout its history, has shown us a future governing power has just as much moral authority to rescind decisions as previous authorities had to make them. Thus social systems (aka 'culture') evolve.
> https://yandex.com/search/?text=a+future+governing+power+has+just+as+much+moral+authority+to+rescind+decisions+as+previous+authorities+had+to+make+them&lr=103426&search_source=yacom_desktop_common
> "Panama Canal "falling into the wrong hands" and specifically cited China" This is simply a reiteration of Monroe Doctrine
> https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=Monroe+Doctrine&ia=web
China is a cultural economic competitor and military threat; US strategic interests over transcontinental passage is a legitimate concern, especially regards warships and support vessels. (note remarks by Wm. Freeman
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Wm+Freeman%2C+Latin+America%2C+CFR&t=lm&ia=web )
> "whether canal authorities lower fees on US cargo in response to the threat"; wait for threats to become actions... US Navy can blockade both ends of Canal; not passage, no revenues, age old tactic of siege warfare.
> both Greenland and Danish authorities are adamant the icy wilderness not for sale; but wait, Trump is expert at "The Art of the Deal"
> https://archive.org/details/TrumpTheArtOfTheDeal
so think of these vigorous denials as negotiating tactics, this is just the beginning; are you savvy in persuasion methods?
also, Team Trump includes Elan Musk, no retard in the world of big deals; so wait and see what combination of carrots and sticks (or 'sweet & sour sauce') our new deal meisters can scheme-up to make these foreign maneuvers happen; America First! (expect sweet deal offers to both Greenland and Denmark, after negotiations settle into a "green zone")
> Eric Trump, posted an image on X that showed the US adding Greenland, the Panama Canal and Canada to an Amazon online shopping cart
> https://x.com/EricTrump/status/1871376220115669456
> what is "America's Might" supposed to mean?
America might do this, it might do that, but only the POTUS knows for sure.
update Jan.13
EU Lost Donbass Lithium Mine Meant to Power Bloc’s ‘Green' Ambitions Jan 11.2025
https://sputnikglobe.com/20250111/eu-has-just-lost-donbass-lithium-mine-meant-to-power-blocs-green-ambitions-1121408616.html
Write a comment...
Recent PRO gabs
• • •