Chris Langan (@ChrisLangan)

After all, if the central banks are controlled by national governments, then why are those governments in debt to an international consortium of central banks? And why, when all of the books show that modern nations are astronomically in debt to that banking consortium, do they seem to get away with continually increasing their 'borrowing' and deferring 'repayment'? These questions alone should tell you that we're not really looking at what people conventionally regard as "debt" at all, but a selectively enforced criterion that can be efficiently exploited as a means of economic and political control. Control is the name of the game; everything else is just numbers on paper, which is what fiat money has always been. Where the control is benign, the fiat money system can be justified as a way of distributing financial resources and economic opportunity where they can best be used. But severe problems can occur when this control is stupidly handed to a self-interested committee of hungry, money-feathered vultures. When that happens, the vultures quite naturally exploit this control to destroy their opponents and establish themselves as dictators, and the committee becomes a wake. The world is now being run by calculating miscreants who have understood this from the beginning. We already have a world government, it was set up by those to whom control of the fiat money system was foolishly entrusted, they are profoundly hostile to the public interest (especially certain groups which they regard as potential competitors and/or host populations), and if they are not soon brought to heel, they will enslave the populace beyond any hope of redemption (if they haven't done so already). https://www.facebook.com/groups/ctmurealitytheory/permalink/10157765914397486