Flavinkins (@Flavinkins)
Posted
51 replies · 3 reposts · 2 likes
https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.01533v1 https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09112 https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=e8c20375-f982-44c3-a223-84dd579f640d https://zenodo.org/record/4486195#.YuLAaxZ6slT https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08163 https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03288 https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1836803/v1 https://zenodo.org/record/5702700#.YuS77RZ6slT https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ZgbQc4Oi0QxzHvye__aRoasdhELkZK_9 "if you want to claim WIV had viruses there's no evidence it had" - but let's never dare to ask any questions about their deleted database or the unknown viral strains they certainly had in their possession in 2019.” @graybea71861266 https://archive.ph/dx9dc https://archive.ph/0JvfP Unpublished virus sequences, especially coronavirus sequences, are found in SRA sequencing datasets in Wuhan almost as many times as the WIV publish SRA datasets for their virus sequences. https://archive.ph/8HY5M Poor compatibility between French and “Chinese original” technologies in a complex and point failure-sensitive system such as the WIV BSL-3/BSL-4 labs, as well as the carefree approach of disposing the exhaust of their BSL-2 and normal labs (20m stack for direct ventilation of BSL-2 and normal lab waste gasses?). https://archive.ph/piWba https://archive.ph/WOvIJ Many, many more datasets got deleted on NCBI.