Flavinkins (@Flavinkins)

https://archive.ph/ANS4Q https://archive.ph/mk9zh “No ascertainment bias” for cluster 1 or accountant Chen? They were only ascertained because the hospitals pulled them from memory after the market cases they received sounding their EID alarms, and reported them alongside the initial market cases in the same batch. Even the HPHICWM cases are to a certain extent influenced in their recognition by the CDC by the Huanan market deliveryman at the WCH (note that accountant chen was received And tested just after the WCH being phoned about the Huanan market deliveryman having a SARSr-CoV, conferring significance to the doctors which was under high alarm for similar cases due to the call—for that day.), which alerted the CDC about a SARSr-CoV the same day as the HPHICWM reported together 4 market cases and cluster 1 (from memory), that they lump together in the same “expert consultation”. It is only after the CDC became aware of the “SARSr-CoV from a deliveryman of the Huanan market” in 29/12/2019, reported largely because of a surveillance program that was set up in the WCH after Holmes’ visit to the HSM in 2014 https://archive.ph/ZgVzp and involving the viral metagenomic (VM, not a standard SARS or MERS test) screening of pneumonia cases that were linked to the market, will the reports from the HPHICWM become recognized by the municipal CDC—by their second report of 4 HSM related case alongside the initial cluster 1, which is the second time they were reported to the CDC, now municipal in stead of district because of the EID alarm being likely triggered within the HPHICWM by the market cases. Despite 1 of the 4 HSM cases being included in the initial report to the district CDC in 27/12/2019, recognition of significance and epidemiological alarm by the CDC will not happen until the second report at 29/12/2019. Without the deliveryman at the WCH or the 4 subsequent HSM cases in the HPHICWM, or if Cluster 1 were admitted to any hospital other than the HPHICWM or the WCH that initially reported the first market cases, no attribution of Cluster 1 to the later “viral pneumonia of unknown etiology” category would have happened, and the fate of the 3 cases would be +3 to the 92 cases that https://archive.ph/Vt4mQ they claim to be “assessed not to be cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection” “Following further review by the external multidisciplinary clinical team”. (25 out of the 92 rejected cases were not tested at all, or more likely, tested positive and were covered up.) If any specific testing results would to become available, they will end up as state secrets, never to be disclosed https://archive.st/archive/2022/7/webcache.googleusercontent.com/t1ek/webcache.googleusercontent.com/index.html . https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108917574500829575 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108835453150695623 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108844336189841977 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108876830805701129 Unfortunately, all you need to “learn about cases at other hospitals” is to ask them. It could be as easy as sending a message to hospitals in the same city “did you receive similar cases from the Huanan market?” especially when the EID alarm within your hospital was already sounded by the cluster of 4 cases you received from a location that was placed under EID surveillance. The “SARSr-CoV found in a Huanan market deliveryman” information is already known by the Wuhan CDC when it was being reported to them by the WCH in 29/12/2019. Given the electronic nature of office work in modern China, querying patient records for “pneumonia cases with reported contact history to the Huanan market” and returning the result informally by text takes only minutes to complete, not an entire day. The information about “other related cases” was not included in the 29/12/2019 report as received and announced by the municipal CDC. As for every other case outside these 2 initial reports (media coverage mean that it would be hard to cover up these 4 cases without jeopardizing the initial reports of market cases in the same time), they are ascertained either based on a direct or indirect connection to the Huanan market, or from “several hospitals (near Huanan market), Huanan market and the neighborhood of the Huanan market. https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108758479291053016 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108856809177556944 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108731797608502118 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108825678909519515 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108729394724285862 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/109228312723838390 With Pekar’s assumption, the PCR swab should cure you. https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108922841820898119 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108727696913215472 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108860074766577121 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108861410320430025 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108865853107949719 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108763931290402313 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108881733087518522