Flavinkins (@Flavinkins)

https://archive.ph/W2Rjj https://archive.ph/87AzE https://archive.ph/dmOXT “ As @Daoyu15 pointed out, one reason for the clustering of early cases around the Huanan wet market without a direct link to it was that authorities were actively trying to identify cases in that area.” (Cases are collected if they have worked at or visited the Huanan market or lived nearby regardless of which hospital they were admitted to, or if they were admitted to one of the “several hospitals (near Huanan market)”) @Tony_vanDongen https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/109169722840473497 "the neighborhood of Huanan market" was used as a criterion for "continued epidemiological surveillance" happening all the way until ~04-05/01/2020. https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108724146438967181 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108825678909519515 And the “initial cases” are also ascertained only through a historical bias which is that the Wuhan municipal health committee and CDC looked only at the Huanan market when monitoring EID cases. The “initial reports” were recognized only by the market cases within them. https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108939607348559500 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/109400102483795216 As for what happened “after 03/01/2020”? 1: compiling case reports and validating them (at the JinYinTan hospital) takes time. https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108731797608502118 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/109169722840473497 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/109909275555101121 2: “试行诊疗方案” and “入排标准”. https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108742419028347251 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/109382280015707894 https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108724146438967181