Joseph M. Lenard (@JLenardDetroit)

Books Cubed podcast opportunity or trap?!?! Chance to EXCEL or FALL FLAT ON MY FACE, should I take the chance?!?!? Got outreach from [#BOOKS](https://truthsocial.com/tags/BOOKS) CUBED [#PODCAST](https://truthsocial.com/tags/PODCAST) about chance to appear on [#Show](https://truthsocial.com/tags/Show) [#episode](https://truthsocial.com/tags/episode)... I NORMALLY write my [#Fiction](https://truthsocial.com/tags/Fiction) [#book](https://truthsocial.com/tags/book) fare solely from what comes to me via [#Dreams](https://truthsocial.com/tags/Dreams) (as discussed on/with BEN THE DREAM WIZARD Show (which can be found on my Video platforms (like [tinyurl.com/JLDonBITCHUTE](https://tinyurl.com/JLDonBITCHUTE) - [old.bitchute.com/video/zXA19on](https://old.bitchute.com/video/zXA19onqSsTH/)))) which would mean me being WAY OUTSIDE COMFORT ZONE going on a Show to have a RANDOM TOPIC picked and try WRITE about right then and there (when normally before writing a Story I would spend 6 hours to 6 days doing a Story-outline before attempting to actually delve into writing story content)... BEEN AGES since I'd been in a CREATIVE WRITING CLASS type environment where such type exercises engaged in - to push, help develop skills, etc.... SHOULD I GO ON??? SHOULD I PUSH MYSELF?!?!? or NOT RISK situation (where is even CHANCE) might fall flat on my Face?!?!? My last email interaction with them... I listened to the one re: ALLIGATORS (94: [youtube.com/watch?v=XwTIWZNbbI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwTIWZNbbIQ) ) and sure glad I did from double stand-point. (1) was fun to hear. (2) more importantly, I better understand the concept as I was confused and thought you meant all on episode would collaborate to create ONE STORY ("too many Chef's" adage came to mind) and would be way more difficult but also/too a lot of fun to try (all panelists write a couple of paragraphs (rather couple pages apiece) and then the panel together share with each other, haggle out how to potentially work them together into one story (perhaps one person tasked with writing an opening, another the middle, the other the ending, so then they can all just be pasted together and then while reading the "sections" the panel as a whole could interject "needed changes" to any one section to help assure flow to/with and relative continuity of all sections better/best flow to create one overall story?!?!?) but indeed the way done makes more sense. I commented on that episode. Even though I thought of the potential "NEW ANGLE" not necessarily advocating to do it as indeed would be more difficult and might need lengthen the overall process, but just throwing the thought out there.