JasparPuggy (@JasparPuggy)

President of Poland publicly proposed the forcible break-up of Russia into "200 ethnic states." He did this in Switzerland in front of 78 other countries attending the "Peace Conference" for Ukraine. So that's 78 countries against Russia . . . i.e. "world war." This idea of breaking-up Russia was first proposed by Gunther Fehlinger, Chairman of the Austria NATO non-governmental organization (NGO) of Austria, in April of 2023 (Original Story Here). His idea called for breaking-up Russia into 41 separate countries, and he was traveling here in the United States at the time (Hudson Institute in Manhattan) to push his idea. He even created a "map" showing how he envisioned Russia being broken apart:...At the time, I thought his idea was so ridiculous as to be laughable. Now, I see it has gained official traction, with the President of Poland formally proposing to 78 other nations at the ongoing Switzerland "peace conference" that Russia be divided not into 41 countries, but into 200 ethnic countries. Gunther Fehlinger's idea has not only gained traction, it has gotten far worse! Do any of the people attending this conference, or who have embraced the idea of breaking-up Russia, ever stop to consider that the Russians may have a thing or two to say about this? Do any of the 78 countries in attendance understand that Russia has the actual ability to nuke ALL of them? Do they think Russia would even hesitate to do exactly that if faced with being forcibly broken apart? I for one, have no doubt at all that Russia WILL do whatever they have to do, to protect themselves. Of this, there is no doubt at all in my mind. Given the reality of what has been going on in the Russia-Ukraine conflict for merely the past month, I have come to the conclusion that the world is headed into ACTUAL "World War" and if you are not prepared - or actively preparing - you and your family will have no chance AT ALL of surviving. We in the West are solely and exclusively to blame for this, and as such, we in the West will likely be hit first and hardest when the war involving us, begins. Why will we be hit hardest?...We in the West have caused this entire problem; yet we have the balls to claim the Russia entry into Ukraine was "unprovoked." It __was__ provoked. By us. We are in the wrong, here. Then, not satisfied that we've caused an actual war, we took to supplying Ukraine with weapons, ammunition, and money to fight Russia. As the Russians overcame all that, we upped the ante again with Longer range rockets, covert intelligence, target selection through airborne and satellite recon. When that failed, we upped the ante again by inserting US/NATO troops to operate even longer range weapons systems. It is OUR people pushing the button on missile launches in Ukraine, yet we have the balls to claim "we are not a party to the conflict." Everything that comes out of OUR mouths, is lies. We started supplying M1A1 Abrams tanks and then M1A2 tanks. They proved so shitty, Ukraine pulled them out of service because they broke down so often, required huge maintenance, and . . . the punch line: Their oh-so-top-secret Armor . . . . gets blown right through by Russian anti-tank weapons. The tanks are almost worthless! Just this month, we "authorized" Ukraine to use west-supplied weapons, to strike deep inside Russia. Well, get this: If we "authorized it" then WE __are__ a party to the conflict. Russia already has the right to strike us!