Kitty Antonik Wakfer (@KittyAntonik)

I don't support the current massive 5G rollout given the need for more testing on health effects of the type(s) radio frequencies employed. A recent journal paper, Aug 2019 Frontiers of Public Health, worth reading: Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701402/ An additional prior study [2016] included a statement in its abstract that warrants elaboration: EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27454111 [Abstract only] "To increase the effectiveness of the treatment [of reduced detrimental EMF exposure], the broad range of other environmental factors that contribute to the total body burden should also be addressed. Anything that supports homeostasis will increase a person's resilience against disease and thus against the adverse effects of EMF exposure. There is increasing evidence that EMF exposure has a major impact on the oxidative and nitrosative regulation capacity in affected individuals. This concept also may explain why the level of susceptibility to EMF can change and why the range of symptoms reported in the context of EMF exposures is so large. ..."This EMF Guideline gives an overview of the current knowledge regarding EMF-related health risks and provides recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and accessibility measures of EHS to improve and restore individual health outcomes as well as for the development of strategies for prevention." IOW there are measures that can be taken by susceptible individuals to reduce the potential damage. A free downloadable full paper pdf is available: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.2016.31.issue-3/reveh-2016-0011/reveh-2016-0011.xml