Posted

0 replies · 0 reposts · 2 likes

There Is No Public Health Utility To The Current COVID "Vaccines" This is really simple stuff-- just read carefully. THE NORMAL ARGUMENT FOR public health utility in a vaccine is that the measure eliminates the hazard of Person A transmitting a pathogen to Person B. That is, the public health utility of a vaccine hinges on it having the effect of immunizing the vaccinated individual from becoming infected and spreading the disease. The current COVID "vaccines" pushed by the Biden administration are not even purported to have the requisite property of conferring immunity-- and they do not. All that is (itself dubiously) claimed of them is that they lessen the severity of the disease as experienced by the "vaccinated" individual. Those "vaccinated" individuals can still catch and spread the virus to others-- including "others" who are themselves fully "vaccinated". See reports here, here and here, for instance. Further, "vaccinated" individuals carry (and transmit) at least as much viral load as unvaccinated (as admitted here by the CDC)-- and possibly a great deal more (as indicated here). Further still, contrary to the deceptions practiced by the "vaccine" boosters in government and the media, infections among the "vaccinated" have been occurring since the very beginning of the "vaccination" rollouts (as admitted here by the CDC). This means that "breakthrough" cases are not a consequence of "waning protection"-- the "protection" has never existed, and the "vaccine" manufacturers have never claimed that their products conferred immunity anyway. (Btw, be sure to note the admission in the fifth paragraph that,"...the number of reported COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases is likely a substantial undercount of all SARS-CoV-2 infections among fully vaccinated persons.") Nor are "breakthrough" cases the consequence of some special property of the so-called "Delta variant". As pointed out in these pages previously in a bit more detail, it is the "spike protein" that makes the COVID virus dangerous. The "vaccines" purport to directly (and exclusively) provide a defense against that singular feature of the virus. If the "vaccines" DO provide a defense against the "spike protein", then unless the "Delta variant" lacks the "spike protein" (and is therefore relatively harmless and not possibly the cause of "breakthrough infections") the "vaccines" will protect just as much against the "variant" as they do against the original version of the virus. All told, then, the "vaccines" can be said to offer a private health benefit (to the extent that the claim of severity mitigation for the "vaccinated" person is true). But they offer no public health benefit whatsoever. Continued: https://losthorizons.com/N/165.htm#1

View this post on Gab