MelBuffington (@MelBuffington)

@CleanupPhilly @mblutzow @WatchmansParadox @CanuckDissenter @Transplant_experiment @Tigger-usa I was not trying to insinuate anything at all. Your wording seemed to indicate that you thought that E=mc^2 was a theory by Asimov. This was actually meant to be helpful, because I know that part of physics, having studied it at a university in a physics program. It was not a non sequitur in the least, it was directly connected to what you were saying. You might not see why it is so, because you do not have the necessary physics background. That is not an insult at all, not everyone has studied theoretical physics at a university. I am trying to point out to you that Dan Borisch is appealing to physical theories to make his claims credible, but that he is using them in a wrong way. Which is a big tell to me that he is not genuine. I also pointed out in my other posts something even more disingenuous on his part, which is listing a number of scientific publications to back up his claims, because they have the terms 'time-reversal processing' in them, even though they have no connection to time travel at all. I was certainly not 'trolling you', on the contrary, I was trying to be helpful to you. I hope that clears things up.