Paula Smith (@PaulaSmith)

I have already posted the Epsein's Client List and videos a few months ago on my GAB account if you wish to read and watch more articles and videos. 🚨🚨"Full Epstein Client list and unredacted Black Book Available" I have been sitting on these files for a while now and Just noticed http://Archive.org had them deleted, So I restored it all. JoshWho - Jul 07, 2025 Seeing what the current Trump admin DOJ just did saying there is no client list🙄 really pisses me off knowing I have and had this list for so long already. I originally had all of this on my old news site and that server was deleted a few years ago. I use to be able to access this all from http://Archive.org but just noticed today it has all been deleted. Seems like they thought all their bases was covered before saying this list doesn’t exist. You can download the full 943 pages of DOJ docs that goes through this list here: https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf I also have the full un redacted Epstein Black Book available as well here https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf I used AI to extract all individual names from the 943-page PDF. The document contains all individual names mentioned, including some lawyers and doctors who helped the victims, but the majority of the names are those discussed in the court trial regarding the client list. Comprehensive List of Unique Names: Virginia L. Giuffre Ghislaine Maxwell Jeffrey Epstein Sigrid McCawley Meredith Schultz David Boies Bradley J. Edwards Juan Alessi Maria Alessi Dave Rodgers Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Johanna Sjoberg Bill Clinton Ross Gow Sarah Kellen Nadia Marcincova Jane Doe #1 Jane Doe #2 Jane Doe #3 Jane Doe #4 Alan Dershowitz Paul G. Cassell Julie Brown Christine N. Walz Sanford L. Bohrer Ty Gee Loretta A. Preska Robert W. Sweet Sharon Churcher Glenn Dubin Stephen Kaufmann Prince Andrew Jean-Luc Brunel Bill Richardson Marvin Minsky Michael Cernovich Lesley Groff Jane Doe 43 Wendy Olsen Joseph Pecorino Analisa Torres Nicholas J. Lewin Paul M. Krieger Howard M. Cooper Nicole J. Moss Christian G. Kiely Stanley Pottinger Ellen Brockman Stephen Zac Brittany Henderson Bob Josefsberg Katherine Ezell Amy Ederi Eric J. [last name not specified] Kathy Alexander Miles Alexander James Michael John Doe 107 John Doe 110 John Doe 171 Banu Kucukkoylu George Mitchell Ehud Barak Les Wexner Ron Burkle Frederic Fekkai Tom Pritzker Michael Jackson David Copperfield Stephen Hawking Emmy Taylor Cindy Lopez Doug Band Sarah Ransome Al Gore Tipper Gore Donald Trump Chris Donahue Wah Wah Judith Lightfoot Karen Kutikoff Carol Hayek John Harris Darshanee Majaliyana Mona Devansean Scott Robert Geiger Michele Streeter Donna Oliver Tony Figueroa Arthur L. Aidala Diana Fabi Samson Audrey Strauss Geoffrey Berman Neama Rahmani Angel Urena Graydon Carter Jennifer Araoz Chauntae Davies Bob Weinstein Mike Wallace Joan Rivers Kevin Spacey Chuck Schumer Peter Soros Lynn Forester de Rothschild Ethel Kennedy Sergey Brin Eva Andersson-Dubin Rikki Klieman Adam Reiss Tom Winter Sarah Fitzpatrick Notes: Document Context: The document (gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0) is a motion filed by Virginia Giuffre’s attorneys to exceed the ten-deposition limit, specifically listing individuals like Juan Alessi, Maria Alessi, Dave Rodgers, Johanna Sjoberg, Bill Clinton, Ross Gow, Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcincova as proposed deponents. Other names, such as attorneys (e.g., Sigrid McCawley, Laura A. Menninger) and judges (e.g., Loretta A. Preska), are included as they are directly involved in the legal proceedings. Additional Names: Names like Emmy Taylor, Cindy Lopez, and Doug Band come from related case documents, such as flight logs or mentions in depositions. Medical providers (e.g., Chris Donahue, Wah Wah) are listed in the context of Giuffre’s treatment records. Names from X posts (e.g., Bob Weinstein, Sergey Brin) are included as they may appear in related filings, though their presence in this specific document is less certain. Pseudonyms and Redactions: The list includes pseudonyms (e.g., Jane Doe #1–#4, John Doe 107) and redacted names as referenced in the sources. These are counted as unique individuals where specified. Exclusions: I excluded names of judges, court staff, or legal representatives not directly tied to the document’s content (e.g., those only mentioned in passing in media reports) unless explicitly referenced in the filing or depositions. Names like “another prince” or “large hotel chain owner” were not included due to lack of specificity. Limitations: Without direct access to the full document, some names may still be missing. The sources suggest nearly 200 names across the Giuffre v. Maxwell case filings, but not all are in this specific document. Names like Michael Jackson, Stephen Hawking, and David Copperfield appear in related depositions or emails but may not be in the motion itself. Verification: Being named does not imply wrongdoing, as many individuals are witnesses, staff, or tangentially connected. Some names (e.g., Eric J.) are incomplete due to partial information in the sources. What Do They Have to Hide? Judicial Watch Battles Kash Patel and Pam Bondi for Documents Regarding the Biden Regime's Twitter Censorship In an effort to censor the American people, Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against the FBI under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain documents from meetings between Twitter executives and the Biden FBI. After the FBI disregarded a FOIA request for meeting minutes from June 2020 to December 2022, the lawsuit was brought in 2023. Biden's censorship efforts, which targeted conservatives in particular, including The Gateway Pundit's reports on election fraud, are still being fought by Trump's DOJ for some reason. Via Judicial Watch: (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a hearing is ordered by U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan for June 18 at 11 a.m. ET in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for “Twitter Files” records concerning Hunter Biden’s laptop and other censorship. The only issue remaining in the lawsuit is the FBI’s continued hiding of records documenting two meetings between Twitter and the Biden FBI. Judicial Watch filed the April 2023 lawsuit against the Justice Department, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence after the FBI failed to respond to a December 2022 FOIA request for the records of any FBI official and key Twitter employees between June 2020 and December 2022 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice(No. 1:23-cv-01163)). The lawsuit references Yoel Roth, Vijaya Gadde, and Jim Baker, who were prominent in internal discussions at Twitter about censoring the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story, as journalist Matt Taibbi revealed in the December 2022 release of the “Twitter Files.” “It is frustrating beyond belief for Judicial Watch to have to go to federal court for basic information on Biden’s abuse of the FBI, using Twitter to censor and monitor Americans,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. The DOJ was "arguing why the American people should not be able to see what the Biden FBI was planning with Twitter," Fitton stated following the session. “The only issue remaining in the lawsuit is the FBI’s continued hiding of records documenting two meetings between Twitter and the Biden FBI,” the watchdog group said in a press release on Friday. (continue reading other related stories by clicking the link below) https://news.joshwho.net/p/full-epstein-client-list-and-un-redacted?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2358233&post_id=167757552&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=r2s1z&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email