Vincent Jappi (@VincentJappi)

A cottage industry of professional liars has developed since 2007 to muddle the issue of the President's and Vice-President's Constitutional eligibility in order to protect “Obama” from challenges to his Usurpation, and Cackala, who is even more obviously ineligible because at least we know her birth circumstances, was able to ride his coattails. As a consequence of such propaganda, most people now confuse “natural-born” with “native-born”, making a mockery of John Jay's letter to George Washington of July 25, 1787 and the consequence it had on the wording of Article II section 1 of the Constitution: to such an extent that Ted Cruz, who by his own admission was born in Canada of a Cuban father, could claim to be eligible in 2016 with the support of equally dishonest fellow Constitutional scholars. But if Marco Rubio runs for President, nothing prevents the Deep State from suddenly “discovering” the Minor Supreme Court precedent of 1875, which it had gone to great lengths to conceal, and profusely let the public find out that a “natural-born citizen” is “BORN IN THE COUNTRY, OF CITIZEN PARENTS”. A standard which until 2007 had been recognized at every turn, including by the only alleged “President” who violated it, Chester Arthur, who had so successfully hidden that his father (like “Obama”'s) was a British subject at the time of his birth that it was only discovered in 2008. What is the mathematical probability that, as actually happened, all the Presidents and Vice-Presidents born after 1787 (save that one exception) were “born in the country, of citizen parents” as a consequence of mere chance, rather than compliance with the generally accepted rule? Marco Rubio is so obviously better than the others that he is the most likely to get the nomination if he runs. If then the Demoncraps choose to play that particular card, with the help of the #FakeNews media which managed to hide that BOTH candidates were likely ineligible in 2008, another Communist will be elected in his stead.