𝖂𝖍𝖎𝖙𝖊 𝕽𝖆𝖇𝖇𝖎𝖙 (@White__Rabbit)

In order to correctly evaluate Jewry's attitude toward the question of human culture, we must bear in mind the essential fact that there never has been any Jewish art, and consequently there is none today. Above all, in those two royal domains of art-architecture and music-Jewry has done nothing original. What they do achieve in the field of art is either a patchwork, or intellectual theft. The Jew essentially lacks the qualities that are characteristic of those creative races that are the founders of culture. To what extent the Jew appropriates foreign civilization or rather it-is indicated by the fact that he chiefly cultivates the art that corrupts calls for the least original invention, namely, acting. And even here he is only a 'juggler,' or rather an imitative monkey; he lacks the final touch that's necessary for true greatness. Even here, therefore, he is not a creative genius but rather a superficial imitator who, in spite of all his twists and tricks, cannot disguise the fact that there's no inner vitality in his work. Here the Jewish press comes in and renders friendly assis- tance by shouting hosannas over even the most ordinary bungler-as long as he's a Jew-until the rest of the world is stampeded into thinking that the object of so much praise must really be an artist. In reality he's nothing more than a pitiful comedian. No; the Jew has no culture-creating abilities of any kind. There is not, and has never been, in him any spirit of idealism that is a necessary element in the higher development of mankind. His intellect will never be constructive, but always destructive. At best, it may serve as a stimulus in rare cases, but only as the archetype of "the power that al- ways wants Evil and nevertheless creates the Good." Human progress occurs not through him, but in spite of him. Adolf Hitler- Mein Kampf Thomas Dalton Editon. Volume 1 Nature and Race Pg-304-305 Sham Culture of jews #FuhrerFriday