Posted

0 replies · 2 reposts · 2 likes

Part 1 "Lab-grown "chocolate" is hitting shelves this year. Here's what's hype and what's real. California Cultured grows cocoa cells in bioreactors and just signed a 10-year supply deal with Meiji, Japan's biggest chocolate company. Four of their headline claims don't hold up: -"FDA filing" = self-affirmed GRAS notice. No FDA response letter on file. -"20x the flavanols" = zero published data. No peer-reviewed paper, no third-party COA. -"More sustainable" = no actual water-use numbers published. Bioreactors still need water for nutrient broth, sterilization, cleaning, and cooling. -"Chocolate" = skips the 4-7 day microbial fermentation and roasting that generate the 88+ flavor compounds making chocolate taste like chocolate. Real chocolate is like a nuanced wine: a bouquet built by wild yeasts and bacteria from pods, insects, hands, and wooden fermentation boxes, then transformed by roasting. A sterile tank can't replicate that. This is a flavanol-rich cocoa-derived powder. Different product. Call it what it is, and watch the label closely. I hate label manipulation." https://www.tiktok.com/@hormonespecialist/video/7636219388953169166 Part 2 "This is the second of four in a series on lab-grown cocoa. The cocoa supply chain is in real trouble. Chocolate demand is rising about 3% a year. West Africa, where 70% of the world's cocoa is grown, is getting hammered by heat, drought, and disease. Up to 81% of Ghanaian cocoa farms are infected with Cocoa Swollen Shoot Virus. Pests and disease wipe out 30 to 40% of global production every year. And about 50 million people worldwide depend on cocoa for their livelihood. So when chocolate companies say they're trying to secure the supply chain, that's a real problem. The question is whether the solutions are proportionate to the risk. Mars (M&M's, Snickers, Dove, Twix, Milky Way) is the outlier. Instead of growing cocoa cells in a tank, they partnered with UC Berkeley to use CRISPR to gene-edit actual cacao trees, plus a separate CRISPR license with Pairwise (Aug 2025) to expand into peanuts, maize, and mint. "We don't want to make the same mistakes as GMOs. There was a lot of public backlash and fear of Frankenfood." -Brian Staskawicz, lead Berkely scientist on the Mars project. That is the scientist running the project. Worried about his own work. Stay tuned for the next Reel on why gene-editing cacao trees is in a whole different category of risk than lab-grown cocoa, and why the regulatory system won't catch the problem before it's everlastingly too late." https://www.tiktok.com/@hormonespecialist/video/7640213397019036942 Part 3 "Who gave Mars the right to edit the genetics of every cocoa tree on Earth? Because that's the actual question. Cocoa cross-pollinates for 40 years. Smallholders in Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire plant seeds from neighboring trees. Once edited pollen is in the regional gene pool, there's no recall mechanism. Ghana exempts most CRISPR edits from regulation. Côte d'Ivoire has a biosafety law but no functioning regulator. So in the two countries that grow most of the world's cocoa, the answer is either "this is exempt" or "nobody's home." This is Part 3 of 4 in a series." https://www.tiktok.com/@hormonespecialist/video/7642129478499568910 Part 4 "Mars is gene-editing cacao trees in California. The pollen carrying the proprietary DNA will reach West Africa. So who now owns the cacao tree? Under existing patent law, the smallholder farmer whose trees get cross-pollinated by engineered pollen could lose ownership of the next generation of his own trees. The U.S. and Canadian Supreme Courts have both ruled that ownership of a plant is no defense against a patent on its genes. Cacao is self-incompatible and depends on cross-pollination. There is no biological defense against engineered pollen drifting in from a neighboring plantation. Mars has been running a CRISPR cacao program at UC Berkeley since 2018. Across eight years of press releases, university announcements, and trade coverage, I cannot find a single public statement about how the engineered cacao trees will be prevented from cross-pollinating their neighbors. And beyond. Eight years. No containment disclosed. The technology to build the fence into the seed has existed for thirty years. A 2023 review in the journal Plants catalogs the options. The Berkeley-Mars team has not used any of it. If you own the gene, you own the fence. Or don't plant it. Sources in the show notes. Tag a chocolate company in the comments and ask them where their cacao comes from. This is Part 4 of 4 in a series." https://www.tiktok.com/@hormonespecialist/video/7643259833331846413 @JakeEli357 #chocolate #food #candy #gmo #labgrown #fake #cocoa #farm #farmer #farmers #farming

View this post on Gab