krazykyle (@krazykyle)

Anytime that a State becomes a Party in any cause, the State no longer has jurisdiction to oversee the cause, because of the obvious conflict of interest that exists when the judge, accuser and attorneys all work for the plaintiff. We are ready to go on June 19, 2026, submitting to SCOTUS, collaterally challenging “personal jurisdiction” of a State when it is both accuser and judge in the same cause. When you are charged by “information” and not an indictment by a grand jury, the State has become the accuser, thus “State of XX v. YOU”. A state cannot become a party in the cause and also oversee the cause… very simply, common sense, “conflict of interest”, written by James Madison in the Federalist #10, Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist #80, ruled by the Supreme Court in Martin v. Hunters Lessee, codified in Title 18 USC §455 and obligated by government in Article III. Section 2. Clause 2. of the Constitution for the United States of America. If the States robbed the People of their right to vote or bear arms through unconstitutional convictions, those federally protected rights must be immediately restored. Let’s give the oppressed the power to rise up democratically against their oppressor. LET MY PEOPLE VOTE! Together, We Shall be Free! Pastor Kenneth Sharpton Glasgow #WeShallBeFree #slavery #SupremeCourt #JusticeForAll #tanawah #tanawahdowning