Posted

0 replies ยท 1 reposts ยท 2 likes

๐Ÿšจ ๐Ÿต๐˜๐—ต ๐—–๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ #๐—œ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—น๐—”๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ผ ๐—ข๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐——๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐˜ ๐Ÿคก The issue of illegal aliens being detained while awaiting their transport out of the country is destined to eventually hit the #SupremeCourt. The Nineth Circuit Court of Appeals (9thCCA) weighed in today and also said no, with a rather goofy and odd reason in their opinion. According to the 9th CCA because no other President has attempted to round up the tens of millions of illegal aliens, it must mean that detaining tens of millions of illegal aliens, while the govt processes them out, is unlawful. In essence, it hasnโ€™t been done, therefore it must be against the law. ๐Ÿคช [๐‘ƒ๐‘Ž๐‘”๐‘’ 5 ๐‘œ๐‘“ ๐ถ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘ก ๐‘…๐‘ข๐‘–๐‘›๐‘”] โ€ฆโ€๐‘‡โ„Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ก ๐‘›๐‘œ ๐ด๐‘‘๐‘š๐‘–๐‘›๐‘–๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘–๐‘œ๐‘› โ„Ž๐‘Ž๐‘  ๐‘’๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ ๐‘“๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘›๐‘‘ ๐‘Ž ๐‘‘๐‘ข๐‘ก๐‘ฆ ๐‘š๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘‘๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘–๐‘™๐‘ฆ ๐‘ก๐‘œ ๐‘‘๐‘’๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘› ๐‘ข๐‘›๐‘Ž๐‘‘๐‘š๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘ก๐‘’๐‘‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘™๐‘–๐‘’๐‘›๐‘  ๐‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘ ๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก ๐‘–๐‘› ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘–๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘œ๐‘“ ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘Ÿ๐‘ฆ ๐‘–๐‘  ๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘Ÿ๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘” ๐‘’๐‘ฃ๐‘–๐‘‘๐‘’๐‘›๐‘๐‘’ ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ก [๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘โ„Ž ๐‘‘๐‘ข๐‘ก๐‘ฆ] ๐‘‘๐‘œ๐‘’๐‘  ๐‘›๐‘œ๐‘ก ๐‘’๐‘ฅ๐‘–๐‘ ๐‘ก.โ€โ€ฆ. This is how far away from commonsense we have traveled in this bastardized lawfare judicial system. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/07/30/9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-says-illegal-alien-detention-unlawful-because-no-other-president-did-it/

View this post on Gab