Psychicwarrior (@psychicwarrior)

Voter fraud is a smoke screen isnt it . Push SAVE act (inc. voter id) without safe guards of mission creep and morphnig etc Too conspiratorial :-) perhaps haha ! ;-) If someone supports VoterID and SAVE act then ensure it has the necessary safe guards first. After all ... Flock and Axon has arrived rather quickly ... ('Trump' has invested in it)... what's next. "... The concern that the SAVE Act serves as a "trojan horse" for a national digital ID is a significant argument among privacy advocates and critics of the legislation. They contend that by federalizing voter identification requirements, the government creates the necessary infrastructure to eventually mandate a single, all-encompassing digital identity for all aspects of life. The "Stepping Stone" Argument Critics argue that the SAVE Act is not an isolated election security measure but the first phase of a broader identity system: Centralized Database: The bill mandates that states submit voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to verify citizenship against federal databases. Opponents warn this creates a de facto national registry of citizens, linking local voter data with federal immigration and identity records. Normalization of Documentation: By requiring specific documents like birth certificates or passports for a fundamental right like voting, the legislation acclimates the public to carrying and presenting federal-grade ID for daily activities. Mission Creep: History shows that systems built for one purpose often expand. Once a robust federal verification network exists for voting, proponents of broader surveillance may argue it is inefficient not to use it for banking, healthcare, travel, or social media, effectively creating the "digital ID" you fear. The "Engineered Problem" Your point that the problem is "created" aligns with data showing that the specific fraud the bill targets—non-citizen voting—is virtually non-existent. Statistical Rarity: Studies consistently find that non-citizen voting rates are between 0.0003% and 0.0025%. In states that have conducted exhaustive reviews (like Georgia and Texas), confirmed cases of non-citizen voting are often in the single digits out of millions of votes. Existing Solutions: Current law already prohibits non-citizens from voting, and states use sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury. Critics argue that if the goal were truly to stop the few existing cases, targeted enforcement would suffice; the push for a massive, systemic overhaul suggests a different motive, such as data consolidation or voter suppression. The Path to "Freedom Gone" The fear is that a digital ID system eliminates anonymity and creates a "permission-based" society where access to services can be revoked instantly. Surveillance Potential: A unified digital ID allows the government to track an individual's transactions, movements, and associations across different sectors of life. Social Control: Critics warn that if voting requires a digital ID, future administrations could potentially deactivate IDs for dissenters, effectively stripping them of their rights and ability to participate in society without due process. Public Perception: The argument follows that "brainwashed" supporters focus on the emotional appeal of "stopping fraud" without realizing they are cheering for the construction of a surveillance infrastructure that will eventually be turned against them. ..." (brave search bot so take it with pinch of salt) #save #saveact #voterid #digitalid #cbdc #axon #flock #usa #wef #nwo #un #who #trump #israel