Quilty Quick Draw (@scissorhands)

#Aloha #Hawaii 🚨Exclusive: I caught the Hawaii State Election Office defrauding the federal government out of $30+ million! Part 1 of 4 Each state must develop their own implementation plan of how they are going to comply with the federal HAVA. The Hawaii Elections Office did so: in 2004. However, they themselves wrote they were non-compliant with over 10 different sections of HAVA. See list below. Even if they cured some of the issues, its mandated they update their HAVA plan & certify to the federal EAC that it is in compliance. They have NEVER done that, in 20 years! But they are taking the feds' money by the millions. Hawaii HAVA Non-Compliance list, per their own writings: 52 U.S.C. § 21083(a)(1)(A): State-administered, centralized, interactive statewide voter registration list: NON-COMPLIANT Requirement: The State must implement and maintain a single, uniform, official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter registration list, administered at the state level. Issue: Hawaiʻi’s system is operated and functionally controlled at the county level, not administered centrally by the State as required. Chief Election Officer Scott Nago has put in writing he lets each of the four counties do it the way they wish! 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a): State-based HAVA administrative complaint procedure required to receive funds: NON-COMPLIANT Requirement: Each State that receives HAVA funds must establish and maintain a compliant administrative complaint procedure. 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(1): Establish and maintain complaint procedure as a condition of HAVA funding: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(A): Uniform and nondiscriminatory standards for complaint processing: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(B): Complaint must be written, sworn, and notarized: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(C): Consolidation of identical complaints: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(D): Right to a hearing on request: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(E): Written determination required if a violation is found: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(F): Written dismissal required if no violation is found, with reasons stated: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(G): Public record of determinations and dismissals: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(H): Final determination required within 90 days: NON-COMPLIANT 52 U.S.C. § 21112(a)(2)(I): Mandatory alternative dispute resolution if 90-day deadline is missed: NON-COMPLIANT Chief Election Officer Scott Nago is committing felonies by taking HAVA monies while knowingly not being in compliance with HAVA. In fact, he is certifying to the federal govt that his office is in compliance (in the annual report) when it is not - because they have several non-compliances!! False certifications! Wait until parts 2, 3 and 4 come out.....and why hasn't the "journalists" in Hawaii investigated the Hawaii Elections Office and their corrupt actors such as Attorney Arthur Schulaner? ~ [Peter Bernegger](https://t.me/PeterBernegger)