Asha Logos (@AshaLogos)

If we accept that both individuals and races/cultures are both creators of their environments, but also products of them, we're then forced to admit that Western/White/European/Aryan (use whatever term you prefer) mankind has long been shaped and conditioned to create, build, cultivate and refine their homelands: They set down deep roots, and truly saw these places as home.. and an unspoken contract of sorts developed amongst all, in which they'd each work - in their own ways - to refine and improve this home.. or at the very least, to hold to a high standard of order, justice, loyalty and honor, and to allow some noble civility to prevail. The Jewish people are entirely unique in this respect. As 'rootless cosmopolitans', they've never been shaped and oriented by this same instinct - of being in their own home, which they sought to selflessly build and perfect. They saw themselves (and consciously made themselves into) the 'other' - the outsider, whose ultimate allegiances often lay elsewhere, and whose foremost 'religious' books not only allowed but encouraged the abuse and parasitism and draining of populations, provided that these populations were not of their own lineage. In short, these two instincts are a complete contrast.. like oil and water. And when they do most freely mix, the one will always slowly but surely come to dominate the other - in the same way a secret society will always gradually come to dominate the unaware elements they move within, if they aim to. Those still oblivious to this difficult truth - and those willing to turn a blind eye, because there's no profit in sounding the alarm, here, and often immense profit in staying quiet and focusing elsewhere - risk eventually costing us everything. Many in our circles have this exclusive and laser focus on Israel, and Zionism.. I don't think this is sufficient. If the Rothschild creation of Israel completely disappeared tomorrow, our situation wouldn't change meaningfully. It's not merely 'Zionism', or merely bolshevism, or merely central banks or a parasitic financial structure - it's a culture, a mentality, a worldview, created across millennia.. and perhaps, as hard as it may be for many to accept, it includes even innate differences that extend to the very core of our being. Are there exceptions to this 'rule'? Of course, and they should be recognized and appreciated for it, given credit where due.. but I don't believe they should be allowed into any positions of great leadership or influence in our own circles - and a policy of ignoring broad level rules because of a handful of exceptions here or there is an incredibly dangerous game. Fool me once, shame on you.. fool me 109 times, shame on me.. An ambitious patent clerk - whom modern popular culture informs us was the smartest man to ever live - once supposedly said 'the definition of insanity is doing the same thing, over and over, and expecting different results'.. I'd suggest we need to consciously seek sanity here, again.