Flavinkins (@Flavinkins)

Holtz: “ Simply not true. Not a dime of our NIH grant ever went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology or any other Chinese institutions. This was a grant for SARS vaccine development between 4 institutions, Baylor, UTMB, NY Blood Center, and Walter Reed Army Institute” @R_H_Ebright: “ Hoitez' denials are demonstrably false: (1) Funding from NIH grant AI098775 is acknowedged in a research publication by the research team led by Shi Zhengli of WIV (https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11427-017-9189-3.pdf) (2) The Principal Investigator of NIH grant AI098775 is Hotez (https://reporter.nih.gov/search/WNMviEkAEk-ohjdU9a9JTg/publications/project-details/9056977). (3) The publication was reported to the NIH by Hotez as an "outcome" of his NIH grant and is listed as an outcome on the http://NIH.gov website (https://reporter.nih.gov/search/CWfo81qNWk-BnOHzX1HhEQ/project-details/9056977#outcomes). (4) When Hotez reported the publication to the NIJ, he certified that he was providing truthful information, subject to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties (https://www.era.nih.gov/erahelp/commons/Commons/status/closeout/final_progress_rpt.htm). Hotez needs to stop denying that his grant provided support to the project led by Shi at WIV Or, if he prefers to continue denying it, then he needs to face "criminal, civil, or administrative penalties" for providing false, fictitious, or fraudulent..claims" to NIH His call” https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.01533 https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1836803/v1 https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03288 Is GX/P2V (found in amplicon form in the “game animals” dataset, still attached to its cloning vector pUC57) a SARS-CoV-2-like CoV that was under research in China? (Especially the form that is found as contaminants—they are sufficiently distinct from the published GX-CoVs to be considered unpublished SARSr-CoVs.) https://usrtk.org/biohazards/american-lab-says-its-contract-with-wuhan-institute-of-virology-may-have-violated-the-law/