Posted

0 replies · 1 reposts · 1 likes

A media coverage bias also exists. The “story” of the cluster 1 report was propped up by CCP state-owned media. This media coverage would only go to the doctor that reported the first officially recognized cases. Any other doctors that reported case clusters elsewhere in Wuhan, because they didn’t report a market case, and because the CDC recognized only the HPHICWM report (grouping it into the later VPUE category) only because of and after the HSM cases were being reported, and when the specific surveillance targeting the HSM at the WCH reported to them the genome of a SARSr-CoV (in 29/12/2019), they didn’t get recognized even if a similar report is given—brushed aside into the 92 CDC-searched and NNDRS-discard cases. No CCP media coverage would land on these doctors, and their story would remain buried just like the 92 cases (that may even included cases that they reported) discarded from the WHO report.

View this post on Gab