Flavinkins (@Flavinkins)

https://zenodo.org/record/7917332 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370635299_Greater_than_the_Sum_of_its_Parts_-_Aggregated_Wuhan_COVID-19_case_data_points_to_the_wrong_side_of_the_Yangtze_River_-_Rixey_-_20230509 Aggregated case data from 38 Chinese studies shows ~5,809 more cases than officially reported from the WIV & BSL-4 districts -& the mkt districts had 4,901 LESS than reported. The data also shows that the entire net gain on the WIV side of the Yangtze River - & the net loss on the mkt side - can be explained by those same districts. &, ALL 38 data sources come from studies by🇨🇳drs & scientists -82% from Wuhan itself & ALL ignored by the CCP's WHO report [3] Somehow, neither the CCP nor the "Proximal Origin" authors who pushed the market-origin hyp for 3 years managed to include >1 of those 38 studies in their own publ. This is disappointing, especially after I urged @MichaelWorobey - publicly & privately - to look at the data. [4] The argument is fairly simple If clear evidence of manipulation of the overall #'s exists, the burden of proof rest on China to show that its WHO report on the early cases - for which no documentation was provided - wasn't also manipulated. @dasher8090 @RepBradWenstrup @Pandora19