Flavinkins (@Flavinkins)

https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/109990250864221296 It is also statistically implausible that all 67 patients that they performed serological test on in 01/2021 would be “serologically all negative”. background positivity rate at that time is already above 4%. The probability of them all “negative for SARS-CoV-2 serology” even if none of them being infected in Nov-early Dec 2019(before 08/12/2019) was less than 6.5% or less than 1/15. This is statistically implausible even under the null hypothesis assumptions. Crippling ascertainment bias in Chinese WHO data that evidently wasn’t “addressed”. https://archive.md/egS7Y https://archive.md/xc2Bb