C.E.O. of BASED (@Keepinitlive)

I'm starting to hate the term "redpilled". The definition of that should be calculated by how long you have rejected MSM and had a thirst for "alternative" sources. If that is just a few months, sorry got bad news for ya, you aren't "redpilled". You are however on the correct path/pattern of behavior. The reason I hate this term is that it puts a cheap label on what it means to truly break free from the "matrix" (another allegory I HATE). The questions you should ask yourself is why? What lead you to this line of thinking? I hate making posts personal, but I am 30 years old. I read "behold a pale Horse" by Bill Cooper(HERO) in 9th grade because of a cool cousin that gave me a copy(deceased {cuz&cooper}). I remember telling my high school frens in (around) 2007 about the "loose change" documentary and the "Zeitgeist" movie. When I was like 16-17. I am not stating this to brag or impugn others creds. My point being is that if Q is your first and only redpill then I would recommend NOT taking the whole bottle at once. The reason the Q movement grew so much in the early days was because of oldfags like me that have been taking slow micro-doses of redpills for YEARS, MANY much longer than me. It is definitely an eye opener to be exposed to "alternative" info , to develop a different worldview than your peers. I would even classify it as exciting sometimes(depressing most others). It is however EXTREMELY important to READ Q DROPS(in my everlasting search for truth, Q is the only true VERIFIABLE intel my civ ass will ever get) beginning to end, at least once a month. The reason I say this is that I have "red-pilled" plenty of normie frens irl, and they always fall for shit like Steinbart,5G ,Flat Earth etc. etc, and that is because they NEVER READ Q. They just gravitate to whatever (insert here) thing on the internet that can "explain" it to them (no different from MSM). Although they may have "taken the red-pill" ,that just basically means you looked something up for once. However when that barrier to question the info you are disseminating breaks, the tendency for you to absorb all info in front of you as truth HAS NOT. Being red-pilled is great, it takes time tho. Being based should be your long-term goal imo. I consider myself based because of the length of time I have been looking into things that I deem important, and any issue or "conspiracy" that I have researched I have done so with a COMPLETE open mind, and hours/months if not years of study. If you ask me where I stand on something I will either politely say "I have not done enough research/open minded to it- let me get back with you, OR I know enough of what I am talking about to DIE ON ANY HILL I STAND ON. Be "red-pilled" AND BASED. The world depends on your due diligence. I hope this makes sense, had a few bourbons. LOVE to ALL in this movement!