Trevor Goodchild (@TrevorGoodchild)

@Hugin2017 asked me to write a brief follow-up explaining the concept of "Original Antigenic Sin" (OAS) and why the "vaccines" (gene therapy) are not only completely ineffective at this point, but frankly damaging and counterproductive. So here we go again: OAS isn't a recent concept, we've known about it since 1950 ("Hoskins effect"). It has to do with the antibodies produced by B-cells from your immune system upon first encountering a viral epitope (portion of the virus that triggers an immune response). Now, a small percentage of these B-cells will become 'memory B-cells' after you clear the infection, which is to say they will not undergo normal cell turnover through natural programmed death mechanisms; they will reside in your body, potentially for decades, and will undergo reactivation immediately upon you re-encountering the infectious agent that they were developed against. The body does this so that you can clear the infection faster the second time around with less resource consumption. So far so good. However . . . These memory B-cells deliberately INHIBIT your naïve B-cells from producing a fresh de novo antibody response against other viral epitopes. This is the 'original sin' referred to in the nickname. And this is a problem if the viral epitope you had previously been exposed to (like, say, an mRNA gene therapy spike protein) has undergone 'antigenic drift' via mutations, because you are now preferentially producing suboptimal antibodies against the infection, and you will take LONGER to clear it than you would have if you had just freshly been exposed. 'Boosting' your immune system with the same ineffective epitope does nothing but worsen this effect, as you are just inhibiting your naïve B-cells from taking over and fixing the problem. Good thing WuFlu isn't part of a viral family notorious for rapid mutation and antigenic drift, especially under artificial selection press- Oh, yeah