Gaul Atreides (@gaulatreides)

Biomass brownoids do commit crimes at a higher rate than Whites. Often, these crimes are heinous. But the criminal element is still a small percentage of the total invasive brownoid population. If criminal activity is the sole determinant of migrant legitimacy, then civic nationalists will have boxed themselves into a position where there is no legitimate claim to deport 90% of the nonwhite invasive force. Same goes for IQ. If that's the determinant, then there is no justification to deny entry to a billion Orientals or ten million Indian Brahmins. The determinant is simple: White lands in White hands. We don't want nonwhites because they are different in ways conspicuous and subtle, and in number they will irretrievably alter the social compact and the culture until these inherited touchstones are completely alien to the native Whites. IQ, crime, personality, values, habits, moral sense, and, yes, even aesthetics....these all matter and every one of them counsels against nonwhite migration in anything but trivially small numbers. ( I would stick with zero) I for one am tired of going out and being visually assaulted by a gurgling black tsunami of swarths, cresting over everything recognizably White, and drowning my heritage in its frothy ugliness. I want to see Whiteness, from one end of the horizon to the other, because that is my birthright and because it is beautiful.