notlebowski (@notlebowski)

I barely ever make a post that isn't a response, because while I have the best followers on the platform, my audience is not very large. I get more traction adding to ongoing conversations than starting my own. Today, I heard something that tickled the old melon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8x7_cAi2FI It's a pretty standard Tucker vid that I was passively listening to. Generally, I think Tucker is a force for good, and I agree with most of what he says. At the very least, I'd call him a fellow traveler, if not an ally, and in these times, we need all the allies we can get. By no means am I saying Tucker is compromised, not to be trusted, or anything like that. The proximate goal is to prevent WW3, and Tucker is aligned there, and it's fairly obvious he's good insofar as that is concerned. He just said something that made me a bit suspicious. The context is we know Tucker applied to be an intern at CIA, and was rejected. Vlad brought it up in their landmark interview even. Starting at 54:00, he talks about the creepiness of Tampon Tim. No big shocker there, we can all tell that guy has skeletons of naked boys in his closet. At the end of the exchange, he says he "doesn't want to be in the polygraph when he [tim] takes it." I held a TS/SCI for many years, but never had to do a polygraph. Polygraphs are only done for specific positions in the military. Based on the guys I knew that did them, the common thread I noticed was they were all jobs working with glowies. I even worked with the NSA and didn't need one. The guys I knew that did them all told me something curious. All of them. They said most of the questions had to do with cp and kid diddling, restated in different ways, over and over. Another interesting part is you can't be denied a position based on the answers you give, even if you admit to crimes. The only thing that disqualifies you is lying. My original normie hypothesis was that stuff was so heinous that if a person was lying it would show most dramatically. Over the years, I learned about epstein and how he was "intelligence," and I viewed those questions in a different light. If you either cop to the kid stuff, or are lying about it, that's a doorway into the "big club" George Carlin was referring to. They can't trust people who are clean. They can't even trust people who have serious vices. They can only trust people who are guilty of the most terrible crimes. My friends "passed" their polygraphs, did the jobs the test was required for, and continued in their modest careers. No flag officer jobs in their futures... Going back to Tucker, I found him invoking the polygraph very strange in this light. To my knowledge elected officials aren't required to get a polygraph. Shoot, there's no way bathhouse barry would have passed a TS background check. (This country's weakness is fucking democracy, reason 5,426.) But glowies would have to. Of course, Tucker was rejected by CIA, so that wouldn't apply to him... Saying all this off the cuff and unguarded looked to me like his mind was connecting tampon tim's "creepiness" with the content of a glowie polygraph. It's such a strange coincidence that he'd equate those things without some insider knowledge. Tucker was a DC guy for a long time, so he might have known people who had to take the polygraph, and those people might have told Tucker what my friends told me. Or he was never "rejected" by CIA. I'm not terribly invested in the answer to this now, but it might be worth looking into more after he helps us avert WW3. I'm not saying he's bad, but maybe not what he seems at first glance.