At first glance the role of a barrister certainly looks a lot cooler than that of a solicitor. You know the deal – it’s all about striding into courtrooms, robes flowing, tense moments waiting for missing witnesses and razor-sharp cross-examinations. During a tax investigation, a tax barrister may provide you with a full understanding of your situation and the subsequent implications. Certain experienced barristers are instructed by solicitors, chartered accountants and other professionals under Licensed Access. They are also able to accept Instructions under the Direct Access scheme. A barrister is an independent lawyer with specialist skills in dispute resolution, litigation strategy and advice and in advocacy before the court. Any https://mataxbarrister.com/inheritance-tax-advice/ Inheritance Tax Advice service will not reveal what he or she has been told to anyone else.
Professional tax barristers advise on tax settlement procedures. Professional help by any https://mataxbarrister.com/tax-barrister/ Tax Barrister service will provide value for money.
The issues surrounding tax and legal services are increasingly under the national and international spotlight. New regulations and legislation mean that this landscape is becoming increasingly complex and the scale and breadth of this is so wide-reaching. Much can be learned from studying the experience of other jurisdictions with their tax laws. Comparative studies can suggest positive directions for change, and can help avoid potential problems. Examining the laws of other jurisdictions can also help show how their rules might interact with proposed rules in one's own jurisdiction to affect transnational business and trade. Pensions specialists have experience of a wide range of private sector pension arrangements, including advising in relation to defined-benefit (final salary type) pension schemes on an ongoing basis, and also in relation to their closure and winding up. Barristers, solicitors or lawyers can provide advice to pension scheme trustees generally and advises in relation to litigious and overseas pension issues such as QROPS. UK tax barristers advise taxpayers in the following areas, which may be of particular interest to the financial community. Advisory services such as https://mataxbarrister.com/domicile-advice/ Domicile Advice are a common sight today.
Specialist assistance for https://mataxbarrister.com/pension-advice Pensions Advice should be sought whenever required.
Professional tax barristers advise on tax settlement procedures. Professional help by any https://mataxbarrister.com/tax-barrister/ Tax Barrister service will provide value for money.
The issues surrounding tax and legal services are increasingly under the national and international spotlight. New regulations and legislation mean that this landscape is becoming increasingly complex and the scale and breadth of this is so wide-reaching. Much can be learned from studying the experience of other jurisdictions with their tax laws. Comparative studies can suggest positive directions for change, and can help avoid potential problems. Examining the laws of other jurisdictions can also help show how their rules might interact with proposed rules in one's own jurisdiction to affect transnational business and trade. Pensions specialists have experience of a wide range of private sector pension arrangements, including advising in relation to defined-benefit (final salary type) pension schemes on an ongoing basis, and also in relation to their closure and winding up. Barristers, solicitors or lawyers can provide advice to pension scheme trustees generally and advises in relation to litigious and overseas pension issues such as QROPS. UK tax barristers advise taxpayers in the following areas, which may be of particular interest to the financial community. Advisory services such as https://mataxbarrister.com/domicile-advice/ Domicile Advice are a common sight today.
Specialist assistance for https://mataxbarrister.com/pension-advice Pensions Advice should be sought whenever required.
Write a comment...
Recent PRO gabs
Female college fencer takes a knee rather than compete against her transgender competitor, who competed on the men's team last year.
USA fencing disqualified her and expelled her from the tournament for her protest.
USA fencing disqualified her and expelled her from the tournament for her protest.
Just days after we exposed the UK government's escalating attacks – including their admission of targeting our infrastructure providers in an act of economic terrorism – new developments confirm that our warnings about the dangers of the UK's Online Safety Act are being recognized at the highest levels, while simultaneously revealing the truly draconian nature of their threats.
First, the Vindication: A recent report in The Guardian has revealed that officials from the U.S. State Department directly challenged the UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, regarding the severe threat the Online Safety Act poses to freedom of expression.
According to the report:
-Officials from the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) met with Ofcom in London.
-During this meeting, they explicitly raised concerns about how the Online Safety Act risks infringing free speech.
-A State Department spokesperson confirmed this, stating: "As vice-president Vance has said, we are concerned about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. It is important that the UK respect and protect freedom of expression.”
This is significant validation of everything Gab has been fighting against. Even elements within the US government recognize the UK Online Safety Act for the threat it is.
Now, the Stark Escalation: While Ofcom downplays the Act, claiming it only targets "illegal content," the reality is far more sinister and extends into unprecedented personal threats. The scope of this law isn't limited; it potentially applies to any user-to-user service accessible in the UK.
And here's the truly chilling part: Buried within this tyrannical legislation is the power for UK authorities to bring criminal charges against named senior managers at companies deemed non-compliant.
Let that sink in. They genuinely believe they have the authority, under this Act, to target individuals – like myself – and potentially send American citizens to PRISON for the supposed crime of refusing to implement the UK's subjective censorship regime on a US-based platform protected by the First Amendment.
This isn't just delusional; it's a stunning display of authoritarian overreach. It's as if they've forgotten we operate in the United States, under US law. This threat to literally imprison executives of foreign companies demonstrates the absolute extremity of their censorship agenda and their disregard for international norms, national sovereignty, and fundamental rights.
What This Means:
Our Fight is Justified & Now Validated: The US State Dept. acknowledges the free speech risks.
Ofcom's Narrative is Disproven: Their actions and the law's text reveal a broader censorship goal, now including threats of imprisonment.
The Stakes are Personal and Existential: This is no longer just about fines or deplatforming; it's about the potential for criminal prosecution of individuals for upholding free speech principles.
Urgent US Action is Imperative: "Expressing concern" is insufficient when faced with threats of economic terrorism and potential imprisonment of US citizens by a foreign government over constitutionally protected speech.
We are leveraging this validation from the State Department, combined with the exposure of these outrageous personal threats, in our ongoing communications with the U.S. Trade Representative, the Department of Justice, The White House, and other relevant bodies. We demand decisive action from the US government, including President Trump's proposed tariffs, to protect American companies, American citizens, and the foundational principle of free expression from this foreign aggression.
This fight has reached a critical intensity. The UK government is not just attacking a platform; they are threatening individuals with imprisonment for defending your right to speak freely. We must have the resources to fight back on all fronts – legal, technical, and political – against this multi-faceted assault.
Defend Free Speech & Stand Against Tyrannical Threats: https://donate.gab.com
(Reminder: US supporters can use standard payment methods. International supporters, due to the ongoing payment processor blockade likely linked to these attacks, please use the Bitcoin option on our donation page for now.)
The masks are off. The UK's agenda involves censorship, economic warfare, and now, the audacious threat of jailing individuals who refuse to comply. We will not be intimidated. Stand with us now, stronger than ever.
Stay vigilant, stay vocal, stay free.
With unwavering resolve,
Andrew Torba and the Gab Team
Christ is King
First, the Vindication: A recent report in The Guardian has revealed that officials from the U.S. State Department directly challenged the UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, regarding the severe threat the Online Safety Act poses to freedom of expression.
According to the report:
-Officials from the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) met with Ofcom in London.
-During this meeting, they explicitly raised concerns about how the Online Safety Act risks infringing free speech.
-A State Department spokesperson confirmed this, stating: "As vice-president Vance has said, we are concerned about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. It is important that the UK respect and protect freedom of expression.”
This is significant validation of everything Gab has been fighting against. Even elements within the US government recognize the UK Online Safety Act for the threat it is.
Now, the Stark Escalation: While Ofcom downplays the Act, claiming it only targets "illegal content," the reality is far more sinister and extends into unprecedented personal threats. The scope of this law isn't limited; it potentially applies to any user-to-user service accessible in the UK.
And here's the truly chilling part: Buried within this tyrannical legislation is the power for UK authorities to bring criminal charges against named senior managers at companies deemed non-compliant.
Let that sink in. They genuinely believe they have the authority, under this Act, to target individuals – like myself – and potentially send American citizens to PRISON for the supposed crime of refusing to implement the UK's subjective censorship regime on a US-based platform protected by the First Amendment.
This isn't just delusional; it's a stunning display of authoritarian overreach. It's as if they've forgotten we operate in the United States, under US law. This threat to literally imprison executives of foreign companies demonstrates the absolute extremity of their censorship agenda and their disregard for international norms, national sovereignty, and fundamental rights.
What This Means:
Our Fight is Justified & Now Validated: The US State Dept. acknowledges the free speech risks.
Ofcom's Narrative is Disproven: Their actions and the law's text reveal a broader censorship goal, now including threats of imprisonment.
The Stakes are Personal and Existential: This is no longer just about fines or deplatforming; it's about the potential for criminal prosecution of individuals for upholding free speech principles.
Urgent US Action is Imperative: "Expressing concern" is insufficient when faced with threats of economic terrorism and potential imprisonment of US citizens by a foreign government over constitutionally protected speech.
We are leveraging this validation from the State Department, combined with the exposure of these outrageous personal threats, in our ongoing communications with the U.S. Trade Representative, the Department of Justice, The White House, and other relevant bodies. We demand decisive action from the US government, including President Trump's proposed tariffs, to protect American companies, American citizens, and the foundational principle of free expression from this foreign aggression.
This fight has reached a critical intensity. The UK government is not just attacking a platform; they are threatening individuals with imprisonment for defending your right to speak freely. We must have the resources to fight back on all fronts – legal, technical, and political – against this multi-faceted assault.
Defend Free Speech & Stand Against Tyrannical Threats: https://donate.gab.com(Reminder: US supporters can use standard payment methods. International supporters, due to the ongoing payment processor blockade likely linked to these attacks, please use the Bitcoin option on our donation page for now.)
The masks are off. The UK's agenda involves censorship, economic warfare, and now, the audacious threat of jailing individuals who refuse to comply. We will not be intimidated. Stand with us now, stronger than ever.
Stay vigilant, stay vocal, stay free.
With unwavering resolve,
Andrew Torba and the Gab Team
Christ is King
Seeking truth
Best move of CENTURY by a Governor. Brilliant. I hear from my doctor friends Ivermectin is MIRACLE DRUG- most effective drug ever, with literally no side effects. Can save millions of lives across USA. Trump & RFK Jr should sign same bill nationally!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/arkansas-gov-huckabee-sanders-signs-bill-approving-purchase/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/arkansas-gov-huckabee-sanders-signs-bill-approving-purchase/
Arkansas Gov. Huckabee Sanders Signs Bill Approving Purchase of Ivermectin Without Prescription | The Gateway Pundit | by Margaret Flavin
Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders has enacted a controversial law allowing the over-the-counter sale of Ivermectin, raising significant questions about public health and regulatory oversight in Arkansas.
The Gateway PunditLink Feed
Good morning, have a blessed Wednesday
• • •