That Would Be Telling (@thatwouldbetelling)

@GenXzanna @Heartiste This very useful Supreme Court decisions recap could use a bit of analysis: it's a mistake to score the Supreme Court on total decisions either way. In theory, according to our Sacred Constitution, they should only be enforcing whatever laws the separate state's legislatures have enacted about Federal elections. But per current conventional wisdom, which you shouldn't entirely trust since frequently at least one state surprises, it will be almost impossible for Trump to win if he doesn't get Pennsylvania, which in 2016 he won by 44,000 votes or 0.72%. So if the Supreme Court puts their thumb on the scale of just that one state, where the cheating is so blatant the AG is rubbing our noses in it by noting on the 31st his side is 6-0, and "If all the votes are added up in PA, Trump is going to lose", don't believe them when claim they were fair based on decisions for other states.