Robert Gamble (@Rfgamble)
Posted
1 replies · 1 reposts · 1 likes
" BAN PISLAM AND SHARIA LAWS AND BOOT ALL PISLAMIC TERRORIST AND PEDOPHILE SUPPORTERS OUT OF ALL OF OUR REPUBLICS ASAP!!!! ... AND CONVERT MOSQUES TO HOMELESS AND VETERAN HOMES !!! Stop ALL GRANTS AND SPECIAL ADVANTAGES TO PILAMICS AND THEIR LYING CRAP... PISLAM IS ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS FOR MOST ALL OF THE CRIMES IN OUR COUNTRY SINCE IT INCREASED WHEN PISLAMICS STARTED BUILDING IN OUR REPUBLICS !!!" -------------------------------------------------------------- El-Sayed's defense of Sharia law stance sparks online eruption from Christians, conservatives: 'He's done' Story by Andrew Mark Miller • 1h • 3 min read "Sharia law is incompatible with Western Civilization," political commentator Carl Jackson posted on X. "I’m tired of El-Sayed playing the victim card in attempt to avoid legitimate scrutiny of Islam." "Yeah, it’s over for him," Fox News contributor Kaylee McGhee White posted on X. "Rogers by 6." "@AbdulElSayed doesn’t get to bloviate about sharia being a mere ‘practice’ of faith when it’s Islamic jurisprudence used to supplant western jurisprudence," conservative commentator and radio host Dana Loesch posted on X. "'Jesse, the Catholic Church requires ministers to use plant oils in sacraments with the blessings of a bishop, so why shouldn't courts allow Muslim men to have four wives?'" conservative commentator Michael Knowles posted on X. "Canon law applies to Catholics," conservative commentator Pamela Geller posted on X. "There is no compulsion is Canon law. Jewish law applies only to Jews. There is no compulsion in Jewish law. It is voluntary. The sharia is a comprehensive legal system governing every aspect of human life, and asserts authority over non-Muslims." "This was a very strange prepared defense from Abdul," GOP communicator Matt Whitlock posted on X. "I expected him to say it was out of context, not reflective of current views, etc. Instead he accepted the premise and defended promoting Sharia Law - opening that lane up to more attacks." "@AbdulElSayed doesn’t get to bloviate about sharia being a mere ‘practice’ of faith when it’s Islamic jurisprudence used to supplant western jurisprudence," conservative commentator and radio host Dana Loesch posted on X. "'Jesse, the Catholic Church requires ministers to use plant oils in sacraments with the blessings of a bishop, so why shouldn't courts allow Muslim men to have four wives?'" conservative commentator Michael Knowles posted on X. "Canon law applies to Catholics," conservative commentator Pamela Geller posted on X. "There is no compulsion is Canon law. Jewish law applies only to Jews. There is no compulsion in Jewish law. It is voluntary. The sharia is a comprehensive legal system governing every aspect of human life, and asserts authority over non-Muslims." "This was a very strange prepared defense from Abdul," GOP communicator Matt Whitlock posted on X. "I expected him to say it was out of context, not reflective of current views, etc. Instead he accepted the premise and defended promoting Sharia Law - opening that lane up to more attacks." .. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/el-sayed-s-defense-of-sharia-law-stance-sparks-online-eruption-from-christians-conservatives-he-s-done/ar-AA2aUj1u?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDGEDSE&cvid=6a8e02cf4e36412aa29f9d1edeafe45f&ei=24