RoseRock (@RoseRock)

I will continue to say, to my last dying day, that final rulings from nine flawed humans called Supreme Court Justices must be resolved by U.S. citizens. We must review their rulings, and society must decide to support or abort their rulings. Resolution of the most dire and difficult questions of our time must be decided by our citizens, not by a few swellheads, no-it-alls in an ivory tower. This is where we draw the line. These are nine helter-skelter individuals who have vast differences in opinions about everything in our U.S. Constitution. Citizens who feel the pain, not nine who are way out of their lane, must resolve the problems and pains. Is there a sensible method for us to decide our own fate without relying on nine imperfect, potentially compromised people with personal agendas? Throughout U.S. judicial history, we find impaired Supreme Court justices suffering from the “Biden Syndrome” of not knowing where they are or who they are, making God-awful decisions. I pose a question to each U.S. citizen. Should we collaborate to develop a viable internet voting system for two-thirds of our population to overturn some of their disastrous and unconstitutional rulings, or should we resign ourselves to being helpless victims of their whims? When I think of leftist liberal, empty-headed shill Ketanji Brown Jackson determining important issues that will affect my life in perpetuity, I become angry and nauseated. This is ‌dangerous nonsense if we continue to allow a few damaged, defective, imperfect, blemished, faulty humans to decide important issues in our lives. We are inching towards a violent revolution if nine people can change the 10 commandments. They are playing God, and we did not agree to that.