Posted

1 replies · 0 reposts · 0 likes

Section 224 of the FY27 NDAA introduces a major risk to U.S. defense sovereignty. By fast-tracking the integration of foreign proprietary tech into core Pentagon AI, cyber, and drone programs, we are creating unvetted supply chain dependencies we can't audit. The current text creates an "Executive Agent" with sweeping authority to bypass traditional DOD tech reviews. This isn't just a national security risk—it’s an institutional overreach that quietly cuts Congress out of the loop on bilateral tech co-production. If foreign black-box software is allowed deep into our defense frameworks, we risk surrendering ultimate control over our own military tech ecosystem. Congress needs to strip Section 224 and preserve strict oversight. After the Epstein Files disclosures and earlier revelations that Trump was bailed out by the Rothschilds: It's plainly obvious who his masters are. Call your Senators and Congressmen, as well as the Senate Armed Services Committees (the House Armed Services Committee approved it): Do it daily since that's a level of pressure they understand (it even sometimes works on the NDAA)*. A sample message that could easily be used would be the following: "Hello, my name is [Your First and Last Name], and I am a voting constituent from [Your City/Town]. My zip code is [Your Zip Code]. I am calling today to urge the Senator/Representative to oppose Section 224 of the FY 2027 National Defense Authorization Act, which deals with the U.S.-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative. I am deeply concerned that this provision creates an unprecedented bypass of traditional congressional oversight and structurally embeds foreign proprietary technology into the core U.S. military supply chain without standard Department of Defense reviews. I believe it compromises American defense sovereignty and limits public accountability over how our defense sectors integrate. I strongly urge the Senator/Representative to support any floor amendments to strip Section 224 from the final bill, or to vote against the bill if this integration mandate remains fully intact. Can you please log my opposition and let me know the Senator's/Representative's position on this specific provision?" Footnote: You can contact the following here... Senate: This includes the phone numbers of every Senator https://www.senate.gov/general/resources/pdf/senators_phone_list.pdf Senate Armed Services Committee: They are the people who introduced Section 224, and committees represent the whole of the United States, so it doesn't matter if you're a constituent of their state. Being an American citizen makes you a constituent by default b. Office Number: 1-202-224-3871 c. Chairman: Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS): Contact: 1-202-224-6253 d. Ranking Member: Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI): Contact: 1-202-224-4642 House of Representatives: This includes a directory of every Representative https://www.house.gov/representatives

View this post on Gab