ctuton (@ctuton)

This study only challenges the age of the Universe. It does not challenge the foundation of the current standard cosmological model. The study clings to the ΛCDM Big Bang and expanding Universe because that is the gospel for most secular scientists and scientists without the backbone to challenge the system. Censorship within science is as prevalent as within politics because for most spineless and money-grubbing scienticians science is politics. Now the mainstream, in an effort to save the naturalistic ΛCDM is starting to consider variable ‘constants’ such as the speed of light in a vacuum. When I pointed out that Barry Setterfield had compiled the scientific history of c measurements all showing a steady reduction in c over time the NASA Space News YouTube channel deleted my comments and references multiple times without explanation. The alternative to a constant c in a vacuum is shown by long term measurements to be a slowing of c. The alternative to an expanding Universe is shown by observation to be a static Universe. The alternative to a finite Universe is an endless Universe. The alternative to QSOs being the farthest and most energetic objects in the Universe is that quasars are local to their parent galaxies that eject them from their AGN cores just as Halton Arp and others have observed and documented. The nature and size of the Universe is far more interesting … and staggering … than the current standard model wishes to admit.