Hospitality Fellowship (@hosfell)
Posted
0 replies · 0 reposts · 0 likes
generative principle of equity = "duty of care" , and to understand "duty of care", why is a proper definition of law, gov't and justice needed? what is equity? (see link below) Why is it important to Study the Gospel of John, https://rushdoonyradio.org/gospel-of-john/ as only RJ Rushdoony can share it? Because this study creates the best bridge for defining "perfected equity" by the "finished work" of the anointed-messiah, yahshua ("JESUS"). Without the "finished work" of the anointed-messiah and the New Commandment He gave us in John 13:34, does one NOT have all that's needed to define a proper perfected "equity"? When "equity" was developed by the English King's chancellors from what other Authority could they draw upon to define what is "fair, just and right"? What "debt"/sin is left without relief after the sacrifice of the perfect Lamb, the Son of Man, raised up from the dead as the new (2nd) Adam? Is there any other "original" source more authoritative than the Testator of a New and Better covenant for defining "equity" and what "perfects" it? Keep the above questions in mind when reading the following definition of "equity" (compared to Law), with all one knows of how the Commander of John 13:34 demonstrated the equity defining "agape" of the "way, truth and life" shown by "the word, become flesh, who dwelt among us"? “The Law is nothing without equity, and equity is everything, even without law. Those who perceive what is just and what is unjust only thru the eyes of the law, never see it as well as those who behold it with the eyes of equity. Law may be looked upon in some manner as an assistance for those who have weak perception of right and wrong… Equity, in its true and genuine meaning, is the soul and spirit of the law; positive law is construed and rational law is made by it.” John Bouvier’s Institutes of American Law 1882, vol. 2, sec 3724. If the one "heir of all things" who "purchased the world and everything in it" is not "holder" of "absolute deed", what "title" could any challenging "qualified heirs" ever claim as priority of this "perfected equity"? ie. does this NOT make an "absolute deed", with a priority consideration of purchase (his life and blood), that can then be declared a mortgage? What is lacking in its completeness? why is a proper definition of law, government and justice needed? what is equity? https://www.minds.com/MTKonig/blog/to-understand-duty-of-care-why-is-a-proper-definition-of-law-936618849442430976?referrer=hosfell